Mathematical analysis identifies fixed points in kernel dynamics, indicating universality and stability in decoherence processes.
This Theorem establishes that the coherence decay rate is the unique globally attracting fixed point of a self-consistent kernel-induced dynamical map. The exponential saturation law of T51 emerges as the asymptotic reduction of this fixed-point structure in the strong-suppression regime, rather than being postulated. The kernel-induced map is F(Γ_coh) := Γ_max[1 − exp(−M(Γ_coh)/M₀)], where the composite hazard variable M(Γ_coh) := P_inst(1 − exp[−β/(γ + Γ_coh)]) is self-referential, stronger decoherence suppresses revival, increasing M, increasing decoherence further. Four steps prove the unique attractor: (1) Monotonicity F'(Γ_coh) < 0 by explicit sign chain; (2) Existence and uniqueness via IVT on G = F − id with G' < −1; (3) Global convergence via even/odd subsequence monotone convergence; (4) Asymptotic reduction, in the regime β/γ ≫ 1, M(Γ_coh) ≈ P_inst and the fixed-point equation reduces to the exponential saturation law Γ_coh ≈ Γ_max(1 − e−P_inst/M₀). Three corollaries: mechanism separation (β = 0 forces Γ_coh* = 0, phase instability alone is insufficient); universality across Q5 parameter families; saturation bound Γ_coh* ≤ Γ_max. The Grumpy Bear Principle provides an informal interpretation of three dynamical regimes: sleeping bear (M ≈ 0, coherent), grumpy bear (instability present but strong revival), and bear claws (M large, fixed point near Γ_max, self-referential lock-in). Status: Fixed-point monotonicity, G' < −1, existence and uniqueness, global convergence, mechanism separation, and saturation bound are all solid by explicit algebraic argument. Asymptotic reduction solid in β/γ ≫ 1 regime, regime validity not yet verified from T17 kernel. Local stability is solid in the perturbative regime. Primary open step: explicit derivation of β from [M_n,D_n]Y geometry from T17 kernel generators. All results inherit T17, T29, T33, T35, T50, T51 conditionality. Dependencies: T8, T11, T29, T33, T35, T50, T51.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Edwin Holdway (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: