Introduction: Land use rezoning policies can spur new investment and revitalization in the area. Such revitalization efforts in low-income areas have been inconsistently linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related outcomes among residents. In the Bronx, New York, a large-scale neighborhood land use rezoning effort provides an opportunity to examine CVD outcomes over time. Methods: This study compared the incidence of CVD in a retrospective cohort of initially CVD-free mid-life and older (≥ 50 years) patients of a large hospital system residing in a Bronx, New York neighborhood undergoing a land use rezoning effort (Jerome Avenue, JA, N=7413) versus residents of a comparison neighborhood (Southern Boulevard, SB, N=3757). The relative hazard of CVD was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, with time from the start of the rezoning (3/22/2018) to the first CVD event (heart disease, heart failure, stroke) as the outcome and followed to end of data collection window (12/31/2024); adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes history, smoking status, insurance type, and neighborhood area deprivation index score. Results: The mean age of the sample was 70.6 years (SD 9.4). Approximately 68% were female and 54% used Medicaid or Medicare to pay for services. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence-free probability showed a reduced risk of CVD in JA vs. SB residents. Three-year and five-year incidence-free probabilities were 93.3% and 89.2% in JA residents compared to 92.2% and 86.5% in SB residents, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.865 (95%CI: 0.775-0.965; p=0.010). Discussion: Mid-life and older adults living in an urban area undergoing a land use rezoning effort to increase affordable housing have a 13.5% lower risk of developing CVD than those living in a comparison neighborhood not undergoing the same rezoning efforts. These results provide further evidence that housing policies can influence cardiovascular health outcomes among residents.
Chambers et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: