Retrospective analysis reveals cancer screening sensitivity for preclinical disease in plasma samples.
BACKGROUND: Blood-based multi-cancer early detection tests have potential for clinical benefit, but key performance metrics for cancer screening, such as sojourn time and sensitivity of these tests for detecting pre-clinical disease, are not yet known. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of stored plasma samples in the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study-3 (CPS-3), GRAIL's MCED test was evaluated for detectability prior to cancer diagnosis. Classical state-transition models for cancer screening were modified to characterize the natural history of ctDNA-shedding cancers. The sensitivity estimand for detecting preclinical cancers by the MCED test was proposed in the context of retrospective testing, and a Bayesian likelihood method was developed to estimate preclinical detectable duration and sensitivity. RESULTS: Analysis of CPS-3 data showed that for the twelve prespecified cancers that represent two-thirds of cancer deaths in the United States, the test had 64% estimated overall sensitivity across all stages, 43% sensitivity during an average 1.36-years preclinical detectable window before metastasis. Untestable assumptions on state transition and sensitivity are discussed, along with limitations related to using stored plasma samples. CONCLUSIONS: State-transition models were developed for retrospective analysis of plasma samples from the CPS-3 study. Estimates for the length of the preclinical detectable window and the sensitivity at screening support annual MCED screening to intercept late-stage cancers. IMPACT: Retrospective analysis of plasma samples from the CPS-3 study supports the potential of GRAIL's MCED test to detect cancers early in the preclinical state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: