PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Modeling Earth Systems and Environment0 citationsOpen Access

Predictive performances of machine learning– and deep learning–based univariate and multivariate reservoir inflow predictions in the Chao Phraya River Basin

View Full Paper
ARAreeya RittimaJKJidapa KraisangkaPDPheeranat Dornpunya

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the predictive performance of machine learning and deep learning models for reservoir inflows.
  • Developed univariate and multivariate prediction models for Bhumibol and Sirikit dams
  • Utilized XGBoost and LSTM algorithms for daily and monthly inflow predictions
  • Compared predictions from individual models and a single integrated model
  • Machine learning and deep learning models demonstrated superior predictions for daily inflows with NSE values of 0.86 and 0.77
  • XGBoost generally outperformed LSTM in univariate predictions
  • Both models exhibited underprediction of low inflows and overprediction of high inflows

Abstract

Abstract This study demonstrated the predictability of Machine Learning (ML)– and Deep Learning (DL)–based univariate and multivariate predictions of reservoir inflows of Bhumibol (BB) and Sirikit (SK), two major dams in the Chao Phraya River Basin. XGBoost, tree–based ensemble–, and LSTM, deep neural network–based algorithms were selected for development of daily and monthly prediction models. For univariate prediction, the inflows of the BB and SK dams were predicted separately using two individual models. In contrast, for multivariate prediction, a single model was developed to simultaneously predict the inflows of both the BB and SK dams facilitating the integrated decision–making processes. Across all prediction scenarios, ML– and DL–based models demonstrated superior performances in predicting daily reservoir inflows for BB and SK dams compared to monthly predictions, achieving NSE values of 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Since modeling with LSTM algorithm can effectively handle larger datasets, this enables single multivariate prediction model to predict closer results to those individual univariate models performed by XGBoost and LSTM for BB and SK prediction. XGBoost models mostly outperformed LSTM when tested on the datasets for both daily and monthly univariate predictions. Among all prediction scenarios, underprediction of low reservoir inflows and overprediction of high reservoir inflows by both univariate and multivariate models had consistently existed. Therefore, extracting specific and informative insights from the results of each model type, forecasting horizon, and algorithms used can significantly enhance decision–making support for both real–time reservoir operation and long–term reservoir management planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rittima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530ed2https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-026-02795-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative assessment of machine learning models for daily streamflow prediction in a subtropical monsoon watershed2026 · 5 citations
  2. 2Stream flow prediction utilizing deep learning models in the Lake Abaya-Chamo sub-basin, South Ethiopia2026
  3. 3From climate signals to smart predictions: advanced machine learning and deep learning for hydrological modeling in data-scarce Bangladesh2026
  4. 4From Climate Signals to Smart Predictions: Advanced Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Hydrological Modeling in Data-Scarce Bangladesh2026
  5. 5River water level forecast sensitivity to hydrometeorological input variable selection: a comparison of machine and deep learning models in Bangladesh2026