This investigation demonstrates improved mechanical performance in self-compacting concrete, highlighting the role of a porous structure in high temperature conditions, suggesting benefits for the use
The high content of fine materials required in self-compacting concrete to ensure flowability reduces matrix porosity, thereby increasing vulnerability to deterioration and heat-induced spalling at high temperatures. This paper investigates the unconventional use of red ceramic waste as a replacement for limestone filler in self-compacting concrete, leveraging its porous structure to attenuate thermo-hydro-mechanical effects and mitigate heat-induced spalling. Residual compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, mass loss, homogeneity, capillary absorption, and evidence of heat-induced spalling were monitored in conventional and self-compacting concrete conditioned specimens after exposure to temperatures ranging from 200 °C to 800 °C at 1 °C/min. Heat-induced spalling was simulated by subjecting unconditioned specimens to a high heating rate to 1000 °C at 27 °C/min, thereby replicating severe thermal loading conditions. The self-compacting mixture with red ceramic waste fulfilled flowability and stability requirements at the fresh state. Replacing limestone filler with red ceramic waste enhanced residual mechanical performance, particularly in the 200 °C to 600 °C range, highlighting the beneficial role of the waste’s porous structure in mitigating thermo-hydro-mechanical damage. Although incorporating red ceramic waste did not entirely prevent heat-induced spalling at a high heating rate, it significantly reduced damage severity compared to limestone filler. Furthermore, self-compacting mixtures with red ceramic waste as a filler required 3% (C30) to 10% (C40) less cement, offering a potential reduction in the concrete carbon footprint and contributing to circular economy principles through the valorization of industrial waste.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gouveia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: