PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Pharmaceutics0 citationsOpen Access

Comprehensive Powder Rheological Characterization of Fifteen Lactose-Based Co-Processed and Single-Component Excipients Using FT4 Powder Rheometry and European Pharmacopoeia Methods: A Multi-Parameter Comparative and Correlative Study

View Full Paper
MRMartin RöttigBWBertram WolfJZJessica Zwanzig

Key Points

  • This research aims to establish a comprehensive characterization of lactose-based excipients through advanced rheological methods.
  • Characterization of fifteen excipients using FT4 Powder Rheometry and European Pharmacopoeia methods.
  • Measurements included bulk density, tapped density, compressibility index, flow time, and angle of repose.
  • Dynamic image analysis was performed for particle size and shape.
  • Pearson correlation matrices were computed across 53 parameters.
  • Identified strong correlation between Specific Energy and compressibility index (r = 0.85).
  • Classified flow indices showed most CPE as good-to-satisfactory but lacked discrimination.
  • FT4 showed a fourfold range in Basic Flowability Energy and significant differences in aeration sensitivity.
  • Particle size distribution breadth was a critical determinant over median size for flow properties.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Co-processed excipients (CPEs) are designed for direct compression through particle engineering, yet comprehensive powder rheological profiles systematically comparing advanced and traditional characterization methods remain limited. This study characterized fifteen lactose-based excipients using European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) methods and the complete Freeman FT4 Powder Rheometer measurement suite, establishing a correlation framework linking particle-level attributes to macroscopic flow behavior. Methods: Fifteen excipients were characterized for bulk and tapped density, compressibility index, flow time (Ph. Eur. 2.9.16), and angle of repose (Ph. Eur. 2.9.36). Particle size and shape were measured by dynamic image analysis. FT4 measurements comprised stability and variable flow rate testing, consolidation, aeration, compressibility, permeability, shear cell, and wall friction at three surface roughness. Pearson correlation matrices were computed across all 53 parameters. Results: Classical flow indices classified most CPE as good-to-satisfactory, failing to discriminate materials with fundamentally different dynamic flow profiles. FT4 testing revealed a fourfold range in Basic Flowability Energy (624–2107 mJ), a ninefold range in flow function coefficient (4.3–35.8), and wide aeration sensitivity differences (Aeration Ratio: 1.9–283.7). Strong correlations were identified between Specific Energy and compressibility index (r = 0.85), cohesion and Flow Rate Index (r = 0.79), and Normalized Aeration Sensitivity and pressure drop (r = 0.86). Within-family comparisons (Tablettose 70/80/100, FlowLac 90/100) revealed that particle size distribution breadth is a more critical flow determinant than median size alone. Conclusions: Combining FT4 rheometry with pharmacopoeial testing provides substantially greater discriminating power than either approach alone, enabling rational excipient selection for direct compression formulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Röttig et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8eca04f884e66b53134fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18050558
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper