PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Journal of Flood Risk Management1 citationsOpen Access

Building‐Scale Flood Hazard Modelling for Risk Assessment of Cultural Heritage

View Full Paper
CAChiara ArrighiCLClaudia De LuciaFCFabio Castelli

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a building-scale flood hazard modelling approach for cultural heritage sites.
  • Developed a 2D building-scale flood hazard model incorporating architectural features.
  • Applied the model to the Marini Museum in Florence, Italy.
  • Used an offline-coupled hydraulic model with a 2D urban-scale flood model to simulate flood dynamics.
  • Showed that urban-scale flood maps often overestimate internal flood depths in heritage buildings.
  • Demonstrated that the building-scale model effectively represents internal inundation processes in exhibition spaces.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Flooding is among the most frequent natural hazards threatening cultural heritage sites, yet current flood hazard studies often operate at urban or regional scales. While building‐scale damage models exist, they generally rely on flood depth inputs from large‐scale inundation models, inputs that may fail to capture the internal complexity of heritage buildings. This paper presents a 2D building‐scale flood hazard modelling approach designed to improve risk assessment, management, and adaptation for cultural heritage buildings. The method incorporates detailed architectural and structural features—such as basements; openings; uneven floor levels; and interior spatial layout—to simulate internal flood dynamics. The methodology is applied to the Marini Museum in Florence, Italy. An offline‐coupled hydraulic model is used in conjunction with a 2D urban‐scale flood model to simulate floodwater ingress, internal flow patterns, and the effects of mitigation measures. Our results indicate that relying solely on urban‐scale flood maps leads to substantial overestimation of internal flood depths, whereas the building‐scale model represents inundation processes within exhibition spaces. Such approach provides a more robust foundation for risk assessment and mitigation planning that supports heritage managers in the correct placement and display mode for vulnerable artworks, thanks to a risk classification of exhibition spaces. Future work will address model validation and extend this approach to heritage buildings with multiple levels under a variety of flood scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arrighi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa979b04f884e66b53190fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A novel and scalable flood risk assessment framework for cultural heritage based on unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry and multi-scale rain-on-grid hydraulic modeling2025 · 9 citations
  2. 2Flood vulnerability assessment of built cultural heritage: Literature review and identification of indicators2024 · 34 citations
  3. 3Flood vulnerability models for damage assessment of artworks and cultural heritage buildings2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Saving a World Treasure: Protecting Florence from Flooding2017 · 11 citations
  5. 5Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage at large spatial scales: Framework and application to mainland Portugal2019 · 92 citations