Experiment reveals response times in dual tasks can be affected by backward crosstalk, indicating context matters.
Dual tasking typically comes with performance costs in at least 1 of the 2 tasks relative to their performance as single tasks. In addition, compatibility relations between stimuli and responses can affect task performance. We here focus on the (response-related) backward crosstalk effect (BCE): Response times in Task 1 are shorter if the responses in Task 1 and 2 share compatible rather than incompatible spatial features. Interestingly, the BCE shows a sequential modulation: It is larger after compatible Trials N – 1 than after incompatible Trials N – 1, although the underlying reasons remain unclear. We report 2 experiments. Whereas Experiment 1 replicated the sequential modulation, Experiment 2 did not when effector combinations changed from trial to trial. These results suggest that sequential modulations of the BCE do not occur when the context of a trial changes to a sufficient degree. Additional results from applying a diffusion model attribute the sequential modulation to less Task 2 response activation after incompatible Trials N – 1. This result offers insights into the mechanisms underlying task shielding in dual tasking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janczyk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: