PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Circulation0 citations

Abstract TU176: Differential Impacts of Wild Blueberry Consumption on Cardiometabolic Health in Middle-Aged/Older Adults with Above-Normal Blood Pressure

View Full Paper
NGNancy GhanemSLSylvia LeeEWEmily Woolf

Key Points

  • This research aimed to investigate the effects of wild blueberry consumption on cardiovascular health in middle-aged and older adults with above-normal blood pressure.
  • Conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
  • Included postmenopausal adults aged 40–75 with elevated blood pressure
  • Participants consumed either 22 g/day of freeze-dried wild blueberry powder or a placebo for 12 weeks
  • Assessed vascular function, blood biomarkers, and gut microbiota composition
  • Analyzed data using linear mixed-effects models and diversity analyses
  • 44 of 52 participants completed the study with ~96% compliance
  • No significant effects on reactive hyperemia index or Framingham RHI
  • WBB consumption did not affect arterial stiffness metrics compared to placebo
  • Placebo group showed increases in several blood pressure metrics
  • Treatment affected community composition of gut microbiota significantly

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests polyphenol-rich wild blueberry (WBB) consumption can improve cardiovascular health, but research in middle-aged and older adults with above-normal blood pressure (BP) is needed. Objective: Our study investigated the impact of 12 weeks of daily WBB consumption on vascular function (i.e., endothelial function, arterial stiffness), BP, blood biomarkers, and gut microbiota composition in adults with above-normal BP. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trial, postmenopausal women and men aged 40–75 y with elevated BP or stage-1 hypertension (HTN) (i.e., systolic BP 120–139 and/or diastolic BP (DBP) 80–89 mmHg) were randomized to consume either 22 g/d freeze-dried WBB powder or isocaloric placebo for 12 weeks. Endothelial function (primary outcome) was assessed using reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and Framingham RHI (fRHI). Secondary outcomes included arterial stiffness (carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity, augmentation index), brachial and aortic hemodynamics, cardiometabolic biomarkers, and gut microbiota composition. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks using linear mixed-effects models including treatment, time, and their interaction, with covariates retained via backward elimination. Alpha- and β-diversity, and differential abundance analyses assessed community structure and taxa associations. Results: Of 52 participants randomized, 44 completed the study (WBB = 24; placebo = 20; ~96% compliance/group). Participants were 57 ± 1.41 y, 34% female, and 64% with HTN. There were no main or interaction effects on RHI or fRHI. Aortic pulse pressure increased after 12 weeks of WBB consumption compared to placebo (+2.97 mmHg; 95% CI 0.29, 5.67). Within-group, placebo participants had increases in brachial DBP (+2.32 mmHg; 95% CI 0.16, 4.48), aortic DBP (+2.87 mmHg; 95% CI 0.39, 5.36), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (+2.61 mmHg; 95% CI 0.07, 5.15), AIx (+3.27%; 95% CI 0.15, 6.40), and AIx@75 (+4.68%; 95% CI 1.66, 7.70), but not in WBB group. AIx@75 at Week 12 was higher in placebo group compared to WBB (+4.99%; 95% CI 0.29, 9.69). β-diversity analyses showed main effect of treatment on overall community composition (PERMANOVA R 2 = 0.03, p = 0.048). Conclusions: Daily WBB consumption for 12 weeks did not improve vascular function, though data suggest it attenuated increases in DBP, MAP, and AIx indices, suggesting potential cardiovascular-protective effects and warranting further investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghanem et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa980604f884e66b531d19https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.153.suppl_1.tu176
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper