PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography in Breast Cancer

View Full Paper
*(*Nawras Nasser Hassin (MBChB, FICMS), Abbas Ali Hassin (MBChB, FICMS), Dina Ismail Mashallah (CABS)

Key Points

  • To evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic mammography in detecting breast cancer among symptomatic women over 40.
  • Conducted an observational comparative prospective analysis at Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital.
  • Included 57 female patients with symptoms suggestive of malignancy.
  • Utilized histo-pathological examination as the gold standard for assessment of mammography accuracy.
  • Statistical analysis included Independent t-test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test.
  • Overall accuracy of diagnostic mammography reported at 75.4% in detecting breast cancer.
  • Sensitivity was found to be 78.6%, and specificity was 72.4%.
  • Positive predictive value was 73.3%, while the negative predictive value was 77.8%.
  • Significant mammographic signs of malignancy included microcalcifications and BIRADS grades 4 and 5.

Abstract

Backgrounds: Diagnostic mammography is an important investigation and part of the "Triple Assessment Protocol" especially in symptomatic over 40 women with inconclusive breast pathology on clinical and ultrasonography assessment. Aim: This study aims at evaluation of the accuracy of diagnostic mammography in breast cancer. Design and Setting: An Observational Comparative Prospective Analysis conducted in the "surgical consultation clinic" and the "Breast clinic" of Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital; a tertiary center in Baghdad/Iraq over the period from 1st of Dec. 2013 till 31st of Dec. 2014. Patients and Methods: A cohort of 57 female patients with a mean age of 46.9 ± 10.7 years, who are complaining of breast symptoms and signs suggestive of malignancy, were included. Personal data collected and the results of clinical examination and mammography were reported and analyzed. The result of histopathological examination is considered as the "Gold Standard" against which the accuracy of mammography is evaluated. Whenever possible; statistical analysis using "Independent t-test", "Pearson's chi-square test" or "Fisher exact test" were performed and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: According to histopathology; two groups of patients are verified; a "Cancer" and "No Cancer" group. The mean age, smoking, positive family history and history of contraceptive pills therapy were significantly higher in the cancer group. Mass(s) is the most common pathology. Among mammography descriptions, only "well definition" of the mass attained a statistical significance supporting benign rather than malignant pathology. The only mammographic sign of malignancy which was statistically significant was presence of microcalcification(s). BIRADS grade 4 and 5 of the mammography reports proved significant in discriminating malignant from benign lesions. Statistical analysis of the results concluded a sensitivity of 78.6%, a specificity of 72.4%, a Positive Predictive Value of 73.3% and a Negative Predictive Value of 77.8%. Consequently; Diagnostic Mammography has an overall accuracy of 75.4% in this setting. Conclusions: Accuracy was lower than the reported figures for a diagnostic mammography setting. The result is partly attributed to the nature of patients sample and partly to the inconsistency of the mammography reports.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

*Nawras Nasser Hassin (MBChB, FICMS), Abbas Ali Hassin (MBChB, FICMS), Dina Ismail Mashallah (CABS) (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa983604f884e66b5320a5https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20020128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSTIC MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST CANCER2026
  2. 2Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography Versus Ultrasound and Clinical Examination in the Prediction of Malignancy of Breast in Women Presenting with Palpable Breast Lesions, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard2025
  3. 3Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Mammography and Ultrasound in the Detection of Malignant Breast Lesions Using Bi-RADS Classification Taking Histopathology as the Gold Standard2024
  4. 4RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BREAST LESIONS DETECTED BY MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION AT AL-THAQALAYN ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL, BASRA2026
  5. 5Radiologist Accuracy in Predicting Pathology in Breast Imaging2024