PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Geriatrics0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Dual Tasking on Intersegmental Coordination During Walking in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Cross-Sectional Case–Control Study

View Full Paper
VMValéria Feijó MartinsEBEdilson Fernando de BorbaLALucas de Liz Alves

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate how dual-tasking affects intersegmental coordination during walking in individuals with Parkinson’s disease compared to older adults.
  • Thirty-two individuals participated (16 with Parkinson’s disease, 16 older adults).
  • Participants walked under single task and dual-task conditions involving math and texting.
  • Data on spatiotemporal and intersegmental coordination were collected using a motion analysis system.
  • Dual-task conditions negatively impacted spatiotemporal and kinematic variables.
  • Significant task effects were found for thigh-shank coordination.
  • No significant differences in coordination outcomes between the two groups.

Abstract

Background: In dual-task (DT) conditions, individuals must walk while simultaneously engaging in cognitive or motor tasks, which impacts gait performance, especially in older adults and individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Gait impairments in PD under DT conditions have implications for intersegmental coordination. Research question: Intersegmental coordination and gait biomechanics during the DTs were compared between people with PD and older adults. Methods: Thirty-two individuals (16 PD, H and 16 older adults) participated in this study and were asked to walk under the following self-selected conditions: single task, DT with a math component, and texting on a cell phone. Spatiotemporal, angular, and intersegmental coordination data were collected using a markerless motion analysis system (OpenCap). Results: Dual-task conditions significantly affected spatiotemporal and kinematic variables, as well as intersegmental coordination. A significant task effect was observed for thigh–shank coordination, whereas no significant group effect was found for the main coordination outcomes. Significance: Significant task effects were observed for intersegmental coordination (thigh–shank CRP), with no significant group differences. The concurrent demands of processing visual and motor information for texting and walking lead to significant reductions in gait speed and lower limb movement, as well as altered intersegmental coordination, with task demands rather than disease status being the primary driver of coordination changes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martins et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa986a04f884e66b53231chttps://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11030053
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper