PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Diagnostics0 citationsOpen Access

Development and Initial Validation of the Novel Computational Method for Dynamic Intracardiac Blood Flow Evaluation

View Full Paper
DVD VolkovUniversity Hospital BrnoDSDmytro SkoryiCentre for Social InnovationBBBogdan BatsakTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Key Points

  • Develop and validate a Python-based method for dynamic intracardiac blood flow evaluation.
  • Developed a program for blood flow visualization using imaging modalities including angiography, MRI, ICE, TEE, TTE.
  • Utilized ECG-gated ICE DICOM images from patients undergoing AF ablation for testing.
  • Produced dynamic flow visualizations and computed the turbulence index and blood mobility fraction.
  • Identified distinct flow patterns in patients with sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To develop and preliminarily evaluate a practical Python-based program for dynamic intracardiac blood flow visualization and the extraction of new quantitative parameters, serving as an initial step toward future flow-based cardiac evaluation. Methods: The method was technically explored across five imaging modalities (angiography, MRI, ICE, TEE, TTE) using standard diagnostic hardware. Preliminary testing used ECG-gated ICE DICOM images from sixteen patients undergoing first-time AF ablation. Results: The program produced dynamic full-chamber flow visualizations and automatically computed two image-derived surrogate markers of flow-pattern behavior, the *turbulence index (TI)* and *blood mobility fraction (BMF)*, across cardiac cycles. Distinct preliminary flow patterns were observed between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. Outputs are exportable for AI analysis. Conclusions: This proof-of-concept approach demonstrates feasibility for routine intracardiac flow assessments, and introduces TI and BMF as potential flow-based biomarkers for future prognostic use after additional validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Volkov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa989404f884e66b5324bfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16091352
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper