PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2009The Journal of Chemical Physics780 citations

A long-range-corrected density functional that performs well for both ground-state properties and time-dependent density functional theory excitation energies, including charge-transfer excited states

View Full Paper
MRMary A. RohrdanzKMKatie M. MartinsJHJohn M. Herbert

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We introduce a hybrid density functional that asymptotically incorporates full Hartree-Fock exchange, based on the long-range-corrected exchange-hole model of Henderson et al. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 194105 (2008). The performance of this functional, for ground-state properties and for vertical excitation energies within time-dependent density functional theory, is systematically evaluated, and optimal values are determined for the range-separation parameter, omega, and for the fraction of short-range Hartree-Fock exchange. We denote the new functional as LRC-omegaPBEh, since it reduces to the standard PBEh hybrid functional (also known as PBE0 or PBE1PBE) for a certain choice of its two parameters. Upon optimization of these parameters against a set of ground- and excited-state benchmarks, the LRC-omegaPBEh functional fulfills three important requirements: (i) It outperforms the PBEh hybrid functional for ground-state atomization energies and reaction barrier heights; (ii) it yields statistical errors comparable to PBEh for valence excitation energies in both small and medium-sized molecules; and (iii) its performance for charge-transfer excitations is comparable to its performance for valence excitations. LRC-omegaPBEh, with the parameters determined herein, is the first density functional that satisfies all three criteria. Notably, short-range Hartree-Fock exchange appears to be necessary in order to obtain accurate ground-state properties and vertical excitation energies using the same value of omega.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rohrdanz et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa9b483cd444e92178d8b9https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3073302
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper