PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej0 citationsOpen Access

Changes in periapical radiograph signs before and after root canal treatment for chronic periapical periodontitis

View Full Paper
XHXiaohui HuXZXiaoli Zhou

Key Points

  • To observe radiographic signs before and after root canal treatment for chronic periapical periodontitis.
  • Enrolled 100 patients with chronic periapical periodontitis
  • Assessed periapical radiograph signs before and after root canal therapy
  • Classified patients into healed and unhealed groups based on healing status at 12 months.
  • Periapical radiograph indicators X, Y, L, and H decreased significantly post-treatment (p < 0.05)
  • Certain factors identified as risks for nonhealing include coronal microleakage and instrument fracture
  • Protection against nonhealing correlated with retreatment after surgery.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to observe the changes in periapical radiograph signs before and after root canal-based management chronic periapical periodontitis and their relationships with treatment prognosis. Materials and Methods One hundred patients (100 teeth) with chronic periapical periodontitis receiving root canal therapy were enrolled. Periapical radiograph signs before and after treatment were assessed. On the basis of the healing status of the periapical lesions at 12 months, patients were allocated into a healed group ( n = 74) and an unhealed group ( n = 26). The maximum horizontal diameter ( X ) and maximum vertical diameter ( Y ) of periapical shadows, as well as the maximum horizontal length ( L ) and maximum vertical height ( H ) of alveolar bone resorption were recorded. Potential risk and protective factors for nonhealing were analyzed. Results The values of X , Y , L , and H decreased progressively at 3, 6, and 12 months following treatment, and all were significantly smaller than before treatment ( p 2 mm and overfilling, coronal microleakage, instrument fracture, and increases in X , Y , L , and H at 3 months after treatment became risk factors for nonhealing at 12 months after root canal treatment, while retreatment after surgery was a protective factor ( p < 0.05). X , Y , L , and H at 3 months after treatment were positively correlated with the nonhealing risk of tooth apexes ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Periapical radiograph indicators were reduced after root canal treatment, which are closely related to the poor healing of tooth apexes and conducive to early diagnosis and intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa1eb04f884e66b532978https://doi.org/10.2478/ahem-2026-0002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The efficacy of 3 root canal sealers combined with warm gutta-percha vertical compression technique in the treatment of dental pulp disease2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Efficacy of dental floss in the management of gingival health: a randomized controlled clinical trial2022 · 48 citations
  3. 3Orifice barriers to prevent coronal microleakage after root canal treatment: systematic review and meta‐analysis2023 · 18 citations
  4. 4Utility of a haemoglobin test of gingival crevicular fluid: A multicentre, observational study2023 · 4 citations
  5. 5Assessment of Digital Intraoral Periapical Radiograph for the Detection of Apical Root Resorption in Inflammatory Periapical Pathologies: A Radiovisiography Study2023 · 2 citations