PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Eng—Advances in Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Enhanced Puzzle Optimization Algorithmfor Complex Engineering Design Problems

View Full Paper
HKHasan KanakerEAEssam AlhroobHAHammoudeh Alamri

Key Points

  • This research focuses on improving the performance of the Enhanced Puzzle Optimization Algorithm (EPOA) for engineering design issues.
  • Introduced a hybrid approach integrating uniform crossover, random-resetting mutation, and elitism into EPOA.
  • Formalized EPOA's update rules and provided pseudocode and flow diagrams.
  • Conducted comprehensive tests on the CEC2022 benchmark suite and on six classical constrained engineering problems.
  • EPOA ranked 1 on 11 of 12 functions in benchmark tests, significantly reducing error rates.
  • Achieved strong balance in exploration and exploitation across various engineering designs.
  • Demonstrated high robustness in finding solutions even with complex constraints.

Abstract

This paper introduced the Enhanced Puzzle Optimization Algorithm (EPOA), a hybrid metaheuristic that augmented the original Puzzle Optimization Algorithm (POA) with uniform crossover, random-resetting mutation, and explicit elitism. The contribution does not lie in inventing these operators individually, since they are classical search components, but in integrating them into POA’s two-phase search dynamics to address premature convergence, diversity loss, and best-solution preservation in a targeted manner. This paper formalized EPOA’s update rules, provided pseudocode and flow diagrams, and enforced bound handling for box-constrained problems. Comprehensive tests on the CEC2022 single-objective benchmark suite (F1–F12) showed that EPOA attained rank 1 on 11 of 12 functions and rank 3 on the remaining case, with large error reductions relative to baseline POA (e.g., on F1, the mean error dropped from 62.836 to 0.004; on F6, the mean error dropped from 2370.962 to 7.239). The method was further evaluated on six classical constrained engineering design problems (welded beam, tension/compression spring, speed reducer, pressure vessel, three-bar truss, and cantilever beam). Statistical indicators such as the mean and standard deviation were used to assess robustness. The results showed that EPOA delivered a strong exploration–exploitation balance and robust solution quality across rugged landscapes and real-world constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kanaker et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa1eb04f884e66b532a29https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhanced Philoponella Prominens Optimization (EESPPO) Algorithm Integrated with Experience Exchange Strategy for Global Optimization and Engineering Design Problems2026
  2. 2An Improved Parrot Optimization Algorithm Applied to Engineering Optimization Problems2026
  3. 3MEPEOA: A Multi-Strategy Enhanced Preschool Education Optimization Algorithm for Real-World Problems2026
  4. 4A novel metaheuristic based on object-oriented programming concepts for engineering optimization2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5MSAPO: A Multi-Strategy Fusion Artificial Protozoa Optimizer for Solving Real-World Problems2025