Meta-analysis shows low complication rates in endobronchial ultrasound for mediastinal lymphadenopathy, indicating its safety for patients.
Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used for evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy. However, its safety profile requires comprehensive evaluation. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of complications associated with EBUS-TBNA and to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled complication rates. Methods: We retrospectively analysed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent EBUS between April 2011 and April 2025. We extracted demographic, procedural, and complication-related data. Major complications were defined as events necessitating endotracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary arrest, hospitalization ≥24 h, mediastinitis, significant bleeding requiring intervention, pneumothorax unrelated to transbronchial biopsy, or death. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Der Simonian and Laird random-effects model to determine pooled complication rates from studies with ≥1000 EBUS procedures. Results: Of the 3,454 patients included 77 (2.2%) experienced complications, with 10 (0.3%) classified as major. Major events included severe bleeding ( n = 4), respiratory arrest ( n = 2), mediastinal cyst rupture, mediastinitis, temporomandibular joint dislocation, and one death. The meta-analysis included 27,560 patients from seven studies and yielded a pooled complication rate of 1.21%. The pooled complication rates from our meta-analysis were 26.2 for major bleeding, 9.6 for mediastinitis, 5.5 for pneumothorax, and 1.52 for procedure-related mortality per 10,000 EBUS procedures. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA is a safe diagnostic procedure with a rare incidence of major complications. Bleeding, infectious complications, and respiratory events constitute the most significant risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ram et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: