Proposed approach demonstrates ethical stability in AI systems, integrating structural divergence for continuous monitoring.
Existing approaches to AI ethics certification rely on static audits, fairness metrics, and human oversight committees, lacking mechanisms for real-time, objective monitoring of emerging ethical risk. We introduce a dynamic framework for ethical stability assessment grounded in the Karimov–Alekberli (KA) thermodynamic framework. The central contribution is the Ethical Stability Metric (ESM), a multi-channel causal entropic response that measures deviations in decision-relevant entropy from an adaptive baseline, augmented by a cross-channel coupling term that captures structural divergence between protected groups. We position our contribution precisely: we do not formalize ethics itself; we formalize the loss of ethical stability. Proposition 1 (proof sketch) states that ethical violations are preceded by measurable destabilization in multi-channel decision entropy—a testable, falsifiable claim supported empirically; full formal proof is deferred to future work. Validation across three settings demonstrates ESM’s leading-indicator capability: a synthetic credit scoring study (ESM leads demographic parity by 12 steps; median 5 steps across 50 Monte Carlo trials); a COMPAS-reconstruction retrospective (ESM detects structural bias escalation within 2 months of deployment; ADWIN and KSWIN: zero detections); and a German Credit age-bias drift study (9-month lead time). A regulatory mapping to EU AI Act Articles 9, 13, 15, and 72 proposes a certification workflow from static compliance to dynamic, continuous ethical monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: