Unsupervised intrusion detection improves security in industrial control systems, highlighting the importance of detecting sensor manipulation.
Industrial control systems (ICS) and SCADA networks underpin critical infrastructure yet remain acutely vulnerable to cyber-physical attacks that manipulate sensor readings while evading conventional IT security tools. We present KA-IDS, an unsupervised streaming intrusion detection system grounded in the Karimov–Alekberli (KA) thermodynamic framework, combining four complementary detection channels: C1 (causal entropy deviation, CER), C2 (structural coupling covariance), C3 (fixed-reference residual z-score), and CB (correlation-break replay indicator). Each alert is attributed in real time to the dominant channel (C1/C2/C3/CB ), satisfying IEC 62443 forensic documentation requirements. Validation on a HAI-statistics-matched simulation (21 sensors, 3 HIL-coupled subsystems, 38 attacks spanning FDI, Command injection, and Replay; 10-day horizon; physics-aware replay model based on published HAI 1.0 parameters [1]) demonstrates: DR = 100% across all attack types including Replay via CB; AUC = 0.864; FPR = 0.04 alerts/hr (1.0/day). Benchmark comparison against CUSUM, Isolation Forest, and a neural autoencoder reveals that ML baselines generate 5–7×more false alarms per day (5.2–7.0 alerts/day) despite comparable or higher AUC, making them operationally untenable under strict ICS alarm management. A stealthy coordinated attack demonstration confirms that five sensors shifted by 0.8σ each—below the individual detection threshold θ=2.5σ—drive C2 to 4.5σ (detected) while max-z and CUSUM score at 2.1σ (missed). This paper is the second in the KA Framework series and invites empirical validation on the real SWaT [2] and HAI [1] datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: