This analysis demonstrates multi-objective optimization improves ship lock scheduling efficiency, indicating effective resource management and energy consumption reduction.
In response to the increasing operational complexity of inland waterway systems, this study develops a multi-objective optimization framework for ship lock scheduling under energy-consumption and resource constraints. The model evaluates five operational dimensions, namely average waiting time, lock utilization, total energy consumption, arrival rescheduling rate, and berth-overcapacity penalty. Based on historical lockage records from the Da Teng Gorge Ship Lock Hub, four representative multi-objective algorithms—NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, and SPEA-II—are comparatively examined. The revised analysis emphasizes trade-off performance rather than unsupported absolute dominance claims: NSGA-III shows the most balanced overall behavior on the preserved empirical instance, MOEA/D remains competitive in time-sensitive scenarios, and SPEA-II performs well in some overcapacity-control settings. To improve methodological transparency, the paper clarifies the physical meaning and source of major parameters, distinguishes measured quantities from scenario settings, and reports carbon impact as a derived indicator linked to energy consumption. These revisions provide a more transparent and practically interpretable basis for intelligent ship lock scheduling under congestion, energy, and resource constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: