Simulation study demonstrates bootstrapping improves parameter estimates and confidence intervals in GARCH models.
This study reflects on the inconsistency of the fixed-design residual bootstrap procedure for GARCH models under dependent innovations. We introduce a recursive- design residual block bootstrap procedure to accurately quantify the uncertainty around parameter estimates and the next period’s volatility. A simulation study provides evidence for the validity of the recursive-design residual block bootstrap under dependent innovations. The resulting confidence intervals are not only valid but also potentially narrower than those obtained by the inconsistent fixed-design bootstrap. In an empirical illustration, we demonstrate the practical relevance by showing residual dependence and differences in confidence intervals between the two bootstrap procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beutner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: