The article demonstrates a practical approach to valuing intangible assets in technology firms, indicating effective transfer pricing strategies.
This article provides practical guidance for the transfer pricing valuation of intangible assets in technology-intensive companies. It addresses key challenges, including delineating technology- and marketing-related intellectual property (IP), mapping interdependencies and translating financial planning and analysis projections into IP-specific cash flows at an appropriate discount rate. The article emphasizes precise IP definition, strategic functional interviews, value-chain analysis and the careful determination of discount rates. By integrating financial, operational, transfer pricing and valuation perspectives within a granular operational transfer pricing framework, the approach enables defensible, economically grounded and forward-looking valuations of complex intangible portfolios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yongchong Mao (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: