Abstract Hegel displays consistent interest in Judaism, but his presentation seems to differ widely between his earlier and later writings. Contemporary scholarly interpretations of this apparent change also differ widely. In this article, I present the interpretive problem as one of continuity‐discontinuity, and place the major scholarly treatments along this spectrum. Then, I advance a fresh interpretative position of discontinuity within a larger continuity of theological purpose and show how this interpretation can account for Hegel's views in both the Early Theological Writings and the 1827 Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion . Finally, I adduce Hegel's 1825/1826 engagement with Philo as an explanation for the discontinuity.
C.O. Reed Frey (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: