Field assessment quantifies airblast spray drift in citrus, suggesting meteorological factors impact drift behavior.
Airblast sprayers remain the dominant pesticide delivery system in California citrus; however, mechanistic characterization of spray transport and off-target fate under realistic field-scale atmospheric variability remains limited. Regulatory airblast drift assessments in the United States (U.S.) currently rely on a sparse, dormant-apple canopy representation, despite substantial structural differences from foliated citrus canopies that may influence drift behavior. To address this gap, this study quantified airblast spray drift in a commercial citrus orchard across multiple downwind distances under varied daytime meteorological conditions and evaluated the influence of distance and weather variables on measured drift. Airborne and sedimentation drift were measured from a conventional axial-fan airblast sprayer operating at 10.3 bar, 5.1 km·h−1, and 935 L·ha−1 in a 4.0 m tall mandarin (Citrus reticulata) orchard using a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved, International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 22866-aligned protocol. Drift collectors (n = 2688), including flat cards, artificial foliage, and horizontal and vertical string samplers, were deployed from 33 m upwind to 183 m downwind of the orchard edge. Airborne drift measurements showed no significant vertical stratification or near-field decay between 8 m and 23 m downwind (p > 0.05), indicating rapid plume homogenization following canopy exit. In contrast, sedimentation drift declined sharply within 30 m and attenuated logarithmically with distance, governed by progressive droplet depletion and plume dilution. Estimated drift cessation distances were 127.5 m for artificial foliage and 182.1 m for horizontal string samplers. Drift magnitude varied significantly among trials (p < 0.05), reflecting sensitivity to meteorological variability. Multiple linear regression identified wind direction, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure as significant predictors of downwind deposition (p < 0.05), whereas air temperature and relative humidity primarily influenced drift through evaporative control of droplet lifetime. Collectively, these results demonstrate that spray drift from foliated citrus canopies is substantially attenuated relative to dormant-canopy scenarios. Although not intended to define regulatory buffer distances, the high-resolution dataset generated provides mechanistically interpretable parameterization inputs for next-generation airblast drift models, supporting improved representation of canopy interactions, plume evolution, and meteorological modulation in regulatory exposure assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larbi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: