Key result
Lifestyle interventions improve cardiometabolic markers in weight-loss-resistant patients, boosting HDLc ~1% per kg lost.
Why the study?
Do long-term lifestyle interventions improve cardiometabolic risk markers in individuals regardless of the degree of weight loss achieved?
Meta-Analysis (n=761)
Yes
Do long-term lifestyle interventions improve cardiometabolic risk markers in individuals regardless of the degree of weight loss achieved?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Even individuals resistant to weight loss from lifestyle interventions can achieve improvements in visceral adiposity and cardiometabolic risk markers by shifting towards a healthy lifestyle pattern.
AIMS: We explored the manifestations of individual weight loss (WL) response to long-term lifestyle interventions on cardiometabolic risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: We pooled data from three large long-term lifestyle WL-intervention trials: 24-month DIRECT (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00160108; n = 322; 87% adherence), 18-month CENTRAL (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01530724; n = 278; 86% adherence), and 18-month DIRECT PLUS (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03020186; n = 294; 89% adherence). We analyzed longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk markers, including anthropometrics, blood biomarkers, and magnetic-resonance-imaging-assessed fat depots, and measured DNA-methylation, proteomics, and metabolomics. Among trial completers (n = 761, mean age = 50.4 years; 89% men, baseline body-mass-index = 30.1 kg/m2), mean WL was -3.3 kg (-3.5%). We classified participants as Successful-WL (36%) with relative-WL > 5%, WL-Resistant (28%) who did not lose or gained weight, and Moderate-WL (36%) with WL between 0% and 5%. Successful-WL achieved the greatest improvements in multiple health indicators. However, the WL-Resistant also showed some significant improvements, with increased high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDLc) and decreased leptin and visceral fat (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). Overall, each 1 kg sustained lifestyle-induced WL was associated with improvements in lipid markers and insulin resistance [HDLc (+1.44%), triglycerides (-1.37%), insulin (-2.46%), HOMA-IR (-2.71%), leptin (-2.79%)] and intrahepatic-fat regression (-0.49 absolute-units)] and modest but significant change in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (-0.26% and -0.36%). We identified 12 significant methylation sites that are associated with Successful-WL (FDR < 0.05; AUC = 0.73). CONCLUSION: While only ∼one-third of individuals achieved long-term WL, the Moderate-WL and WL-Resistant individuals could benefit improvements in visceral adiposity and cardiometabolic risk by shifting towards a healthy lifestyle pattern, beyond WL. Site-specific DNA methylation may predict an individual's likelihood of successful WL. REGISTRATION: NCT00160108, NCT01530724, NCT03020186.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meir et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Overweight/Obesity (n=761). Long-term lifestyle weight loss interventions vs. Baseline / Weight-loss resistant group was evaluated on Longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk markers. Long-term lifestyle interventions improved cardiometabolic risk markers even in weight-loss resistant individuals (P<0.05 vs baseline), with each 1 kg of weight loss further improving HDLc by 1.44%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: