Interpretive bridge paper examines the Schrödinger-cat paradox in quantum mechanics, suggesting a new understanding of reality.
This component houses We Are Never Having a Mathematical Experience: Resolving the Schrödinger Confusion, a Tier 1.5 interpretive bridge paper that provides a philosophy- and physics-facing entry ramp into Universal Collapse Theory. Rather than proposing new quantum dynamics, it argues that the Schrödinger-cat paradox arises from a category error: mistaking a property of our mathematical descriptions for a property of physical reality. The paper reframes superposition as epistemic rather than ontological at the macroscopic level, clarifies the proper role of decoherence and record-writing, and connects the measurement problem to UCT’s broader account of collapse as continuous resolution under constraint. It serves as a clean interpretive companion to WP01–WP02 while preserving the standard formalism of quantum mechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy C. Jones (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: