PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Recognizing Pemphigus Vulgaris in a Low Prevalence Setting: A Journey Through Multiple Diagnoses

View Full Paper
MAMaria Emilia Adenike V. AdedojaMYMa. May Jasmin Ramos YasonMAMelissa Aquino-Villamin

Key Points

  • The aim is to highlight the difficulty in diagnosing pemphigus vulgaris and the importance of timely intervention.
  • Detailed case study of a 72-year-old woman with sequential misdiagnoses over three months.
  • Histopathology revealed intraepidermal acantholysis and direct immunofluorescence confirmed the diagnosis.
  • Treatment initiated with systemic corticosteroids following confirmation of pemphigus vulgaris.
  • Initial treatments for candidiasis and herpes zoster did not alleviate symptoms.
  • Histopathology and immunofluorescence tests confirmed pemphigus vulgaris, with characteristic findings.
  • Prompt corticosteroid treatment led to significant clinical improvement.

Abstract

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune blistering disease that may present predominantly with mucosal involvement and is frequently misdiagnosed as infectious or inflammatory conditions. We describe a 72-year-old Filipino woman with a 3-month history of painful oral and genital ulcerations and subsequent flaccid bullae who was initially diagnosed and treated sequentially for candidiasis, disseminated herpes zoster infection, and Behçet's disease based on International Criteria for Behçet's Disease scoring. Despite multiple antimicrobial therapies, her symptoms progressed. Definitive evaluation revealed intraepidermal acantholysis on histopathology and intercellular IgG and C3 deposition in a characteristic "fishnet" pattern on direct immunofluorescence, with positive desmoglein 1 and 3 antibodies, confirming PV. Prompt initiation of systemic corticosteroids led to rapid clinical improvement. This case underscores how diagnostic anchoring and reliance on classification criteria can delay recognition of autoimmune blistering disease, highlighting the need for early biopsy and direct immunofluorescence in persistent mucocutaneous ulceration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adedoja et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fada7f03f892aec9b1e505https://doi.org/10.1155/crdm/9778760
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pemphigus vulgaris—a blistering clinical enigma: case report2026
  2. 2Severe Pemphigus Vulgaris with Oral and Cutaneous Involvement: A Case Report2026
  3. 3A Case of an Autoimmune Blistering Disease: Pemphigus Vulgaris2024
  4. 4Pemphigus Vulgaris Unmasked in a Patient With Behçet’s Disease: A Complex Diagnostic Dilemma2024
  5. 5Difficulties in the Diagnosis of Pemphigus Vulgaris. Case report2025