This study analyzes the closure, decommissioning, and abandonment (CDA) of a fuel storage and distribution facility in southern Quito, Ecuador, conceptualizing the process as a socio-technical urban transition embedded within territorial governance dynamics. While infrastructure decommissioning is commonly addressed from a predominantly technical perspective, limited research integrates reverse logistics design, stakeholder influence structures, and territorial development into a unified analytical framework, particularly in Latin American metropolitan contexts. Using a mixed-methods case study approach, the research combines documentary analysis, operational data, and 34 semi-structured interviews with public authorities, engineers, fuel marketers, business owners, and community representatives. A thematic analysis was applied to reconstruct the decommissioning logistics chain and to develop a stakeholder mapping and influence matrix assessing actor positions, economic interdependencies, and legitimacy claims. The findings show that decommissioning operates as a structured reverse logistics system embedded within asymmetric governance configurations, where economic dependency, risk perception, and urban redevelopment expectations generate competing territorial imaginaries. Technical feasibility alone proves insufficient to guide decision-making; instead, legitimacy emerges through the alignment of engineering planning, institutional coordination, and community-level expectations. The study advances an integrated socio-technical framework that articulates Engineering Management, Social Management, and Territorial Development, positioning decommissioning as a governance-driven transition rather than a purely technical operation. The results contribute to sustainability and infrastructure transition scholarship while offering practical guidance for managing urban hydrocarbon infrastructure closure in socially vulnerable territories.
Villagómez et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: