Why the study?
Does time-domain analysis of HRV differ between clinically normal Doberman Pinschers and those with mild to moderate myocardial failure?
Does time-domain analysis of HRV differ between clinically normal Doberman Pinschers and those with mild to moderate myocardial failure?
Time-domain analysis of HRV from 24-hour Holter recordings did not differentiate between clinically normal Doberman Pinschers and those with mild to moderate myocardial failure.
Time-domain HRV analysis does not detect mild myocardial failure in Dobermans; leaves open its diagnostic utility in veterinary cardiology.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the salient variables of the time-domain analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) in clinically normal Doberman Pinschers and to compare those variables with those of Doberman Pinschers with cardiomyopathy and mild to moderate myocardial failure. ANIMALS: 46 Doberman Pinschers. PROCEDURE: HRV was analyzed in the time-domain from 24-hour Holter recordings obtained from 28 Doberman Pinschers with normal echocardiograms and 18 Doberman Pinschers with echocardiograms consistent with mild to moderate myocardial failure. RESULTS: Significant differences in HRV variables between the 2 groups of dogs were not detected. The HRV was greater during the nighttime (12 AM to 6 AM), compared with the 24-hour day and an 18-hour (6 AM to 12 AM) period. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: HRV of dogs with mild to moderate myocardial failure was not different from that of clinically normal dogs, because there were no disturbances of autonomic balance, baroreceptor function, and other factors that influence HRV in the dogs with cardiomyopathy, or the sensitivity of time-domain analysis was overwhelmed by normal sinus arrhythmia. The techniques now used to study HRV have important limitations, especially in dogs, and better noninvasive tests of autonomic function are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvert et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: