PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2022European Stroke Journal131 citationsOpen Access

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on screening for subclinical atrial fibrillation after stroke or transient ischaemic attack of undetermined origin

View Full Paper
MRMarta RubieraAAAna AiresKAKateryna Antonenko

Structured PICO

Does longer duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring (>48 h) and use of implantable devices improve the detection of subclinical AF in patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA of undetermined origin?

P
Population
Adult patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) of undetermined origin
I
Intervention
Longer duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring (>48 h), preferably with insertable loop recorders (ILR)
C
Comparator
Shorter monitoring (≤48 h) or non-implantable ECG devices
O
Outcome
Detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF)surrogate

The ESO guidelines recommend prolonged cardiac rhythm monitoring (>48 hours), preferably with insertable loop recorders, to maximize the detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation following an ischemic stroke or TIA of undetermined origin.

Limitations

  • Whether longer monitoring improves clinical outcomes needs to be addressed
  • Comparison of ILR with non-implantable ECG devices for similar monitoring time is lacking
  • Insufficient evidence from RCTs in patients with patent foramen ovale

Abstract

We aimed to provide practical recommendations for the screening of subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) of undetermined origin. These guidelines are based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Five relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome questions were defined by a multidisciplinary module working group (MWG). Longer duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring increases the detection of subclinical AF, but the optimal monitoring length is yet to be defined. We advise longer monitoring to increase the rate of anticoagulation, but whether longer monitoring improves clinical outcomes needs to be addressed. AF detection does not differ from in- or out-patient ECG-monitoring with similar monitoring duration, so we consider it reasonable to initiate in-hospital monitoring as soon as possible and continue with outpatient monitoring for more than 48 h. Although insertable loop recorders (ILR) increase AF detection based on their longer monitoring duration, comparison with non-implantable ECG devices for similar monitoring time is lacking. We suggest the use of implantable devices, if feasible, for AF detection instead of non-implantable devices to increase the detection of subclinical AF. There is weak evidence of a useful role for blood, ECG and brain imaging biomarkers for the identification of patients at high risk of AF. In patients with patent foramen ovale, we found insufficient evidence from RCT, but prolonged cardiac monitoring in patients >55 years is advisable for subclinical AF detection. To conclude, in adult patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA of undetermined origin, we recommend longer duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring of more than 48 h and if feasible with IRL to increase the detection of subclinical AF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rubiera et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbd83e6c3a0c248625dec0https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873221099478
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper