Why the study?
Application of AI for automated ECG diagnosis can improve care in remote settings but is limited by reliance on infrequently available signal-based data.
Does a convolutional neural network trained on ECG images accurately diagnose rhythm and conduction disorders compared to signal-based models?
Does a convolutional neural network trained on ECG images accurately diagnose rhythm and conduction disorders compared to signal-based models?
A novel CNN model using ECG images accurately diagnoses rhythm and conduction disorders, offering a more accessible alternative to signal-based AI models for remote settings.
May enable accessible ECG AI in remote settings without raw signals; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated diagnosis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) can improve care in remote settings but is limited by the reliance on infrequently available signal-based data. We report the development of a multilabel automated diagnosis model for electrocardiographic images, more suitable for broader use. A total of 2,228,236 12-lead ECGs signals from 811 municipalities in Brazil are transformed to ECG images in varying lead conformations to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) identifying 6 physician-defined clinical labels spanning rhythm and conduction disorders, and a hidden label for gender. The image-based model performs well on a distinct test set validated by at least two cardiologists (average AUROC 0.99, AUPRC 0.86), an external validation set of 21,785 ECGs from Germany (average AUROC 0.97, AUPRC 0.73), and printed ECGs, with performance superior to signal-based models, and learning clinically relevant cues based on Grad-CAM. The model allows the application of AI to ECGs across broad settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sangha et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: