The performance of a tubular solar still in an arid region was evaluated for producing freshwater from various water sources. The water sources fed to the tubular solar still were blowdown from a seawater desalination plant, recovered water from an oil production facility, rejected seawater from a reverse osmosis treatment plant, seawater, and rejected groundwater from a reverse osmosis treatment plant. The TDS for these water sources ranged from 17,210 mg/L for groundwater to 221,710 mg/L for produced water. Compared with other water types, produced water had distinct characteristics: low pH, a petroleum-like odor, and a reddish-brown color. The estimated average production rates were 5.1, 5.9, 6.1, 6.6, and 6.8 L/m2·day for produced water, reverse osmosis-rejected water, desalination plant blowdown, seawater, and reverse osmosis-rejected groundwater. Different TSS designs were examined to determine whether production rates could be improved using tap water. Production increased slightly when a blackened basin, steel mesh, or both were applied as heat-absorption enhancements. Therefore, the tubular solar still without any enhancements was found to be a better option due to its lower cost and simpler design. The composition of the residual salts (65–73%) did not meet the 97% standard set by the FAO. The results of the study are promising for future upscaling projects aimed at enhancing water security in rural areas and arid regions.
Almahmoud et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: