Meta-analysis compares mothership and drip-and-ship strategies in acute ischemic stroke, indicating differences in clinical outcomes.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The optimal out-of-hospital referral pathway for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vascular occlusion (AIS-LVO)-direct transport to a comprehensive center (mothership) versus initial evaluation at a local hospital followed by transfer (drip-and-ship)-remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of mothership and drip-and-ship strategies on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 18, 2025, to identify studies comparing mothership and drip-and-ship paradigms in AIS-LVO patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) for primary outcomes, including 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 to 2, 90-day mRS 0 to 3, successful recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: The mothership strategy may improve 90-day mRS 0 to 2 compared with the drip-and-ship, whereas no significant differences were observed in broader functional outcomes, recanalization rates, hemorrhagic complications, or mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Annals of Emergency Medicine