PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Performance of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Models for Drought Prediction in Kano, State, Northwest Nigeria

View Full Paper
OOOrobosa OriahkiCEChukwudi. N EMERIBEPAPrayer. E. ATUMAH

Key Points

  • Assess the effectiveness of machine learning models for predicting drought events in Kano State, Nigeria.
  • Evaluated Random Forest and Support Vector Machine models using historical meteorological data from 2012-2023.
  • Data validated with Nigeria Meteorological Agency at a 0.05 confidence level.
  • Key variables included precipitation, temperature, solar radiation, and various drought indices.
  • Random Forest achieved 66.8% accuracy and 60.3% precision, better than Support Vector Machine's 65.7% accuracy and 45.4% precision.
  • Both models effectively identified drought events, showcasing similar recall scores at 66%.
  • Findings indicated significant drought patterns and spatiotemporal variations in Kano State.

Abstract

Abstract Drought significantly impacts water resources, ecosystems, and human livelihoods, particularly in northern Nigeria, where rainfed agriculture is predominant. The effects, including reduced water supply, poor water quality, crop failure, environmental hazards, and civil unrest, are worsened by climate change, which increases drought frequency and severity. Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of drought—severity, magnitude, intensity, duration, and extent—is critical for early warning, prevention, and preparedness. This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning models—Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—in predicting drought events in Kano State. Historical meteorological data (2012–2023) from the Visual Crossing Weather (VCW) dataset were validated using Nigeria Meteorological Agency (NIMET) data at a 0.05 confidence level. Key variables included precipitation, temperature, solar radiation, and indices such as SPI Gamma, SPEI, and Fisk Distribution. Results indicated irregular rainfall patterns, with a recovery from 2018. SPI3 Gamma and Pearson indices identified dry periods (2013–2018) and wet periods (2019–2022), while SPEI provided a more comprehensive drought assessment by integrating evapotranspiration. The RF model outperformed SVM in accuracy (66.8% vs. 65.7%) and precision (60.3% vs. 45.4%), effectively reducing false positives. Recall scores were comparable (66%), indicating both models reliably identified drought events. Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) performed well and in the absent of hydroclimatic data, the models offer valuable insights for improving climate resilience and drought preparedness in Kano State.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oriahki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3aa164b5133a91a2f7ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20041695
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper