Experimental study reveals specific strength and energy absorption improvements in origami-inspired lattice structures, suggesting enhanced applications in engineering.
In the current paper, two types of origami-inspired lattice structures, inspired by space-filling tessellated origami structure, were developed with body-centred cubic (BCC) and face-centred cubic (FCC) topologies. The influence of lattice topology, taper angle, cone height ratio, and base-to-height ratio were experimentally investigated. The results show that the proper rib-plate topology in BCC-type origami-inspired lattice structures can significantly improve their mechanical performances, including strength, stiffness, and energy absorption capacity. The specific strength and specific energy absorption of modified BCC-type origami-inspired lattice structures outperform the original BCC lattice structures by 95.9% and 218.5%, respectively. Furthermore, the mechanical response of the origami-inspired lattice structures can be optimized by adjusting the geometric parameters of the microstructures, such as taper angle, cone height ratio, and base-to-height ratio. Notably, these designs promote delocalized deformation modes consistently outperform those with localized deformation modes in terms of mechanical performance. Additionally, some of the proposed lattice structures exhibit a pronounced linear strengthening and multi-stage strengthening in their stress-strain response, which can be achieved simply by tuning the base-to-height ratio and rib-plate layout. Overall, our study offers an approach to enhance the mechanical performance of origami-inspired lattice structures, making them suitable for engineering applications that demand both lightweight and high-strength structures. • The proper orientation and topology of plates can improve energy absorption. • The delocalized deformation modes significantly enhance mechanical performance. • The linear and multi-stage strengthening in stress-strain response. • The strengthening mechanisms found in shell and plate lattice structures was used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: