PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026The American Surgeon1 citationsOpen Access

Evolution of the Morbidity and Mortality Conference in Surgery: From Codman to Contemporary Practice

View Full Paper
STSamuel Torres-LandaTFTimothy Farrell

Key Points

  • This review traces the historical evolution of morbidity and mortality conferences in surgery, focusing on its impact on patient safety and education.
  • Examines the historical context of morbidity and mortality conferences.
  • Analyzes the shift from individual blame to systems-based learning.
  • Reviews contemporary approaches incorporating data analytics and multidisciplinary participation.
  • Identifies persistent challenges in M&M structure and reporting.
  • Highlights the continued emphasis on patient safety and quality improvement in surgical care.
  • Shows the ongoing evolution of M&M conferences while maintaining their core purpose.

Abstract

The morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference is a foundational tradition in surgery, serving as a forum for education, accountability, and patient safety for more than a century. Originally rooted in early efforts to track outcomes and improve hospital efficiency, M&M has evolved alongside major developments in surgical education, quality improvement, and patient safety science. This review traces the historical evolution of the M&M conference from Ernest Codman's end-result system to its institutionalization by the American College of Surgeons and formalization in graduate medical education. It examines the cultural shift from individual blame toward systems-based learning, highlights the influence of the patient safety movement, educational theory, and human factors science, and reviews contemporary approaches incorporating data analytics, multidisciplinary participation, and technology. Persistent challenges including variability in structure, underreporting, and medicolegal concerns along with future opportunities to strengthen M&M as a driver of continuous improvement are discussed. Despite ongoing evolution, the core purpose of honest reflection in service of safer and higher-quality surgical care in M&M remains unchanged.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Torres-Landa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbef68164b5133a91a3495https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261448909
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper