PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej0 citationsOpen Access

Inherited thrombophilia and polygenic risk scores in venous thromboembolism: from classical testing to genomic risk prediction

View Full Paper
BCBenilde CosmiGGGrigoris GerotziafasInsermPMPeter MarschangInnsbruck Medical University

Key Points

  • The review summarizes advancements in genetic susceptibility to venous thromboembolism and polygenic risk scores.
  • Narrative review of current knowledge on inherited thrombophilia and genetic factors related to VTE.
  • Discussion of GWAS-derived polygenic risk scores and sequencing-based methods.
  • Evaluation of traditional inherited thrombophilia testing against new genomic approaches.
  • Polygenic risk scores can improve VTE risk prediction beyond classical factors.
  • Genetic susceptibility to VTE varies with clinical presentations and recurrent events.
  • Integration of genetic data into clinical practice faces implementation challenges.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a disorder due to the interaction between genetic, individually acquired and environmental factors. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize advances in genetic susceptibility to first and recurrent VTE, focusing on GWAS-derived polygenic risk scores and sequencing-based approaches, and to discuss current barriers to clinical implementation. Testing for the classical inherited thrombophilias, such as the deficiencies of natural anticoagulants antithrombin, protein C and S and the Factor V Leiden variant and the G20210A of Factor II could improve risk stratification and therapeutic decisions in VTE, although their role in VTE management remains controversial. The knowledge regarding genetic susceptibility for VTE progressed in the last two decades, beyond the classical thrombophilias, thanks to the evolution from single-gene Sanger sequencing to genome wide sequencing (GWAS) and next generation sequencing. GWAS has allowed to construct polygenic risk scores (PRS) combining the effects of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms. PRS could significantly improve VTE risk prediction beyond clinical factors. The integration of genetic and clinical data could improve predictive accuracy. In addition, combining GWAS with transcriptome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization has shown that genetic risk may change across different clinical presentations of VTE and that recurrent VTE differs genetically and biologically from the initial VTE event, being associated with variants such as those of kininogen 1 and fibrinogen. PRS can stratify VTE risk beyond traditional factors in European-ancestry cohorts; recurrence may have a partially distinct genetic / proteomic architecture, but prospective clinical utility remains to be established and integrating this advanced knowledge into clinical practice remains a future challenge in VTE management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cosmi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefa3164b5133a91a3828https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.17287
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper