PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques0 citations

Preliminary Experience of Circular Stapler-based Lower Mediastinal Reconstruction in Robotic Total and Proximal Gastrectomy

View Full Paper
SUShinsuke UsuiKashiwa Municipal HospitalKIKENICHI IWASAKITokyo Medical UniversityRSRyota SakonArtistic Realization Technologies

Key Points

  • The aim was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of circular staplers for lower mediastinal reconstruction in robotic gastrectomy.
  • Twelve patients underwent robotic total or proximal gastrectomy with lower mediastinal reconstruction.
  • Operative time, blood loss, reconstruction time, length of hospital stay, and complications were recorded.
  • Patients were evaluated between March 2023 and December 2025.
  • No conversions to open surgery were required for any patient.
  • In the robotic total gastrectomy group, mean operative time was 498 minutes with 175g blood loss.
  • Postoperative complications included one case of anastomotic stricture and one pancreatic fistula in the robotic proximal gastrectomy group.

Abstract

Background: In minimally invasive surgery for upper gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers, linear staplers are commonly used, and reports of circular‑stapled reconstruction have declined in parallel with the decrease in open surgery. Lower mediastinal reconstruction during robot‑assisted gastrectomy also remains technically challenging. This study describes our surgical technique and preliminary experience with transhiatal lower mediastinal anastomosis using a circular stapler. Methods: Twelve patients who underwent robot‑assisted total or proximal gastrectomy with lower mediastinal reconstruction between March 2023 and December 2025 were included. Total operative time, blood loss, reconstruction time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and esophageal transection length were evaluated separately for robot‑assisted total gastrectomy (RTG) and robot‑assisted proximal gastrectomy (RPG). Results: No patient required conversion to open surgery. In the RTG group (n=6), the operative time, reconstruction time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 498.0 ± 61.1 minutes, 36.2 ± 8.4 minutes, 175 ± 117.3 g, and 14.3 ± 2.7 days, respectively. In the RPG group (n=6), these values were 345.8 ± 51.5 minutes, 75.6 ± 14.0 minutes, 75.0 ± 98.7 g, and 14.3 ± 2.7 days. Postoperative complications included one anastomotic stricture and one Grade B pancreatic fistula, both in the RPG group. No anastomotic leakage occurred in either group. The esophageal transection length was 35.2 ± 14.0 mm in the RTG group and 25.5 ± 7.9 mm in the RPG group, and all resection margins were negative. Conclusion: Circular staplers are feasible and safe for lower mediastinal reconstruction in robot‑assisted total and proximal gastrectomy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Usui et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefc0164b5133a91a3b42https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000001457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper