PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Three-Layer Architecture of Gnosis: A Unifying Framework for Biological and Artificial Cognition

View Full Paper
ZKZdenek KostrouchMKMarta Kostrouchova

Key Points

  • The research aims to propose a unified three-layer architecture of gnosis to understand cognitive systems better.
  • Developed a conceptual model of gnosis with three layers: physical encoding, relational processing, modulation.
  • Conducted comparative cross-domain analysis mapping components to biological systems and artificial intelligence models.
  • Formalized the architecture with a compositional mapping and dynamic update rule.
  • The analysis highlights that biological and artificial systems share principles of information processing and adaptive behavior.
  • Empirical observation of synaptic plasticity supports the framework, indicating rapid adaptive behavior through modulation.
  • The model provides insights into interpretability and system design in cognition.

Abstract

This preprint presents a unified three-layer architecture of gnosis, integrating biological and artificial cognitive systems. Biological and artificial cognitive systems, despite being implemented in fundamentally differentsubstrates, exhibit convergent principles of information processing and adaptive behavior.In this study, we propose a unified three-layer architecture of gnosis that capturesthese shared functional properties across domains. The model consists of (i) physical encoding,(ii) relational processing, and (iii) modulation and validation.We develop this framework through conceptual modeling and comparative cross-domainanalysis, mapping its components onto representative biological systems, transformer-basedlanguage models, and reinforcement learning agents. The analysis indicates that these diversesystems implement analogous transformations of input signals into structured internalrepresentations and context-dependent actions.We formalize this architecture as a compositional mapping G = M◦R◦E, supplementedby a dynamic update rule governing the evolution of the modulatory state. Empirical observationsof synaptic plasticity are consistent with this framework, indicating that rapidadaptive behavior is mediated primarily by modulation of existing connectivity, while structuralchanges occur more sparsely and on longer timescales.This unified architecture provides a parsimonious explanatory framework for understandingthe evolution and organization of cognition across biological and artificial systems, withimplications for interpretability, system design, and the study of distributed intelligence. This work is intended for submission to a peer-reviewed journal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kostrouch et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefc0164b5133a91a3be6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20040792
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper