Functional analysis reveals critical roles of histidine kinase in transcription and signal transduction for bacterial stress responses.
Escherichia coli, a facultative anaerobic Gram-negative member of the Enterobacteriaceae, is an increasingly important opportunistic pathogen driven in part by rising resistance to clinically important antibiotics. Regulation of multidrug efflux systems by two-component signal transduction pathways, particularly the BaeSR system, plays a central role in this process. However, the functional residues governing signal transduction through the sensor kinase BaeS remain incompletely defined. In this study, we integrated domain prediction, homology-guided site-directed mutagenesis, in vitro protein purification, autophosphorylation assays, and reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)-based transcriptional analysis of selected BaeSR-regulated genes to delineate key residues required for BaeS function. Sequence analysis identified His250 as a candidate autophosphorylation site and Asn364 as a conserved residue within the catalytic domain. Biochemical characterization of purified wild-type BaeS and an H250A mutant demonstrated that His250 is indispensable for autophosphorylation. Consistently, RT-qPCR analysis showed that BaeS activation markedly induced the transcription of BaeSR-regulated efflux-associated genes, whereas genetic deletion of baeS or selective disruption of kinase activity by the N364A mutation abolished this response. Together, these findings establish His250 as a key residue for BaeS autophosphorylation and identify Asn364 as essential for inducible BaeSR signaling and activation of resistance-associated target genes, thereby establishing an experimental framework for elucidating BaeSR-mediated efflux regulation and informing future studies of resistance regulatory networks and potential intervention strategies centered on key signaling nodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: