PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026The European Physical Journal C0 citationsOpen Access

Charged Higgs signatures at future electron–proton colliders

View Full Paper
BCBaradhwaj ColeppaGKGokul B. Krishna

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the charged Higgs boson within an extended model in collider environments.
  • Conducted a collider phenomenology study on the charged Higgs boson.
  • Analyzed conventional and exotic decay modes of the charged Higgs boson.
  • Examined potential detection at future electron–proton colliders including LHeC and FCC-eh.
  • Conventional decay modes show observable sensitivity at high luminosities.
  • Exotic decay channel H^- → W'Z showed no viable discovery potential.
  • Findings emphasize the role of electron-proton colliders in studying extended Higgs sectors.

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we present a detailed collider phenomenology study of the charged Higgs boson within a Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) framework featuring an extended gauge and scalar sector. The charged Higgs can decay via conventional modes, such as H^- tb H - → t ¯ b and H^- W^-h H - → W - h, as well as through exotic channels like H^- W'Z H - → W ′ Z (or WZ' W Z ′). These decays lead to distinct final-state topologies determined by the nature of the intermediate particles. We perform a comprehensive phenomenological analysis at future electron–proton colliders, namely the LHeC and FCC-eh, considering the luminosity projections provided in their design reports. Our results indicate that the conventional decay modes of the charged Higgs boson can achieve observable sensitivity and even discovery prospects at sufficiently high luminosities. In contrast, the exotic decay channel H^- W'Z H - → W ′ Z does not exhibit any viable discovery potential. These findings highlight the complementarity of future electron-proton colliders in probing extended Higgs sectors, particularly through conventional charged Higgs signatures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coleppa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefef164b5133a91a40c4https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15677-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics2011 · 3,278 citations
  2. 2DELPHES 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment2014 · 3,063 citations
  3. 3PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual2006 · 9,140 citations
  4. 4Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models2012 · 2,691 citations
  5. 5A Large Hadron Electron Collider at CERN Report on the Physics and Design Concepts for Machine and Detector2012 · 646 citations