Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial shows no improvement in cognitive function of youth with Neurofibromatosis type 1, suggesting more research is needed.
Background: Children and youth with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) commonly experience motor, behavioral, and cognitive problems.Promising findings from an NF1 mouse model suggested that the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) might address underlying mechanistic deficits. Methods:We conducted a 12-week (8-week treatment, 4-week washout), double-blind, placebocontrolled randomized trial of NAC in 8-16-year-olds with NF1.We screened 481 children, identified 203 eligible, and randomized 25; 23 received at least one dose (10 NAC at ~70 mg/kg/day; 13 placebo).Outcomes were safety, tolerability, motor function (primary: Physical and Neurological Examination for Subtle Signs), cognitive function (secondary: Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder symptom scores and executive function measures), and exploratory biomarkers (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy measures).Results: In the modified intention to treat analysis, no significant difference in PANESS was observed between groups.In completer-analyses, NAC did not improve any secondary or exploratory outcome at 8 weeks.NAC was generally well tolerated, although two participants were withdrawn by parents because of worsening behavior.Test-retest reliability of scales, measures, and biomarkers over 12 weeks was generally moderate.Conclusions: NAC was generally well tolerated but did not improve motor or behavioral outcomes in youth with NF1.Larger, longer trials with preceding dose-escalation and target-engagement studies are needed to evaluate new therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilbert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: