Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fenretinide, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR), is a synthetic amide of all-trans-retinoic acid (RA), which inhibits cell growth, induces apoptosis, and is an antioxidant, and cancer chemopreventive and antiproliferative agent. These findings led us to investigate which structural component of 4-HPR contributes to these potent activities. Our approach was to examine 4-aminophenol (4-AP), p-methylaminophenol (p-MAP), and p-acetaminophen (p-AAP). It was found that vitamin E, 4-AP and p-MAP scavenge alpha,alpha-diphenyl-beta-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals in a 1:2 ratio, in contrast to 4-HPR and p-AAP, for which 1:1 and 1:0.5 ratios were observed relative to DPPH radicals. However, RA was inactive. Lipid peroxidation in rat liver microsomes was reduced by compounds (RA > p-MAP = 4-HPR > 4-AP) in a dose-dependent manner, while p-AAP was inactive. In addition, both p-MAP and 4-HPR are potent inhibitors of cell growth and inducers of apoptosis in HL60 cells. p-MAP exhibits the same level of antiproliferative activity as 4-HPR against HL60R cells, which are a resistant clone against RA, and it inhibits the growth of various cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MCF-7/Adr(R), HepG2, and DU-145) to an extent greater than 4-AP and p-AAP, but is less potent than 4-HPR. Thus, although the antioxidant activity of p-MAP is more potent than that of 4-HPR, p-MAP is less potent than 4-HPR in anticancer activity. These results suggest that both the anticancer and antioxidative activities shown by 4-HPR are due to the structure of p-MAP. The retinoyl residue or long alkyl chain substituent attached to an aminophenol may be significant for anticancer properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: