Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial compares PNF and JM effects on shoulder function and pain in shoulder impingement syndrome, suggesting distinct benefits.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and joint mobilization (JM) on shoulder function, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS).Methods: Thirty patients diagnosed with SIS were randomly assigned to either a PNF group (n = 15) or a JM group (n = 15).Both groups received conventional rehabilitation with additional PNF or JM techniques for 6 weeks (3 sessions/week).Shoulder function was assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), structural changes were measured via AHD, and pain sensitivity was evaluated using PPT.Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with post-hoc analyses was performed.Results: Both interventions significantly improved all outcome measures.The PNF group demonstrated superior improvements in SPADI (p < 0.05) and PPT (p < 0.05), indicating enhanced functional recovery and reduced pain sensitivity.The JM group showed greater increases in AHD, suggesting more effective subacromial space restoration.Significant group time interactions were observed for SPADI and PPT. Conclusion:Both PNF and JM were effective for SIS management, with distinct therapeutic advantages.PNF showed superior effects on functional recovery and pain modulation, while JM was more effective for structural space restoration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: