Slow fixed-rate pacing is an attractive and accurate indirect method for measuring the refractory period during persistent atrial fibrillation in a goat model.
BACKGROUND: Recently, the temporal excitable gap during atrial fibrillation (AF) has been identified as a vulnerable parameter for cardioversion of AF. In this study, we evaluated 5 methods to measure the refractory period (RP(AF)) and the excitable period (EP(AF)) during persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 11 goats instrumented with 83 epicardial atrial electrodes, persistent AF (43+/-34 days) was induced with a median AF cycle length (CL) of 98+/-14 ms. To measure RP(AF), premature stimuli were applied to the center of the electrode array on the right or left atrium. The RP(AF) measured by mapping of premature stimuli was 70+/-12 ms ("gold standard"). The RP(AF) determined during entrainment of AF was 77+/-17 ms (R(2)=0.88, P<0.01). Statistical analysis of the effects of synchronized stimuli (each coupling interval x100) on the AFCL histogram yielded an RP(AF) of 70+/-13 ms (R(2)=0.94, P<0.01). A further simplification was to apply slow fixed-rate pacing (1 Hz) during AF. For each stimulus (n=250 to 500), the paced AFCL was plotted against its coupling interval, and capture was determined by statistical shortening of the AFCL (RP(AF) 71+/-17 ms, R(2)=0.84, P<0.01). The 5th percentile of the AFCL histogram as an index of RP(AF) was 77+/-12 ms (R(2)=0.90, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During persistent AF with an AFCL of 98+/-14 ms, the RP(AF) determined by mapping of synchronized premature stimuli (gold standard) was 70+/-12 ms, with an excitable period of 28+/-8 ms. Although the indirect methods to measure RP(AF) all correlated well with the gold standard, slow fixed-rate pacing seems to be the most attractive technique because of the ease of acquiring the data and the clear graphic result.
Duytschaever et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: