Why the study?
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve outcomes in patients with resistant hypertension and related comorbidities?
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve outcomes in patients with resistant hypertension and related comorbidities?
Renal denervation shows potential beyond blood pressure reduction for conditions like heart failure and metabolic disease, but requires rigorous placebo-controlled trials to confirm efficacy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May extend renal denervation to heart failure and metabolic disease; leaves open practice change without placebo-controlled trials.
Hypertension imposes a major burden of morbidity and mortality and is associated with sympathetic nervous system overactivity. Renal sympathetic denervation has been shown to reduce office blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure, and sympathetic activity in patients with resistant hypertension. Therefore, the procedure has attracted a lot of attention. Beyond blood pressure, renal denervation has been shown to improve glucose tolerance, microalbuminuria, and arrhythmias in several experimental models and, in admittedly, often uncontrolled clinical studies. It has been demonstrated to reduce myocardial hypertrophy in a blood pressure-independent and blood pressure-dependent way. The first studies on heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction are ongoing. Renal sympathetic denervation holds promise for future indications in hypertension and related comorbidities and consequences, such as metabolic disease, renal failure, and heart failure. Published data in a placebo-control blinded study, however, are needed. The aim of this review is to provide a critical and comprehensive overview of heretofore generated data on renal denervation in experimental models, in human hypertension, and on early developments in new indications, which should indicate the way to powered and performed, controlled clinical studies appropriately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Böhm et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: