Does NOAC monotherapy reduce net adverse clinical events compared to combination therapy with NOAC plus clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation who had a drug-eluting stent implanted at least 1 year earlier?
960 patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone the implantation of a drug-eluting stent at least 1 year earlier, mean age 71.1 years, 21.4% women, in South Korea.
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy
Combination therapy (NOAC plus clopidogrel)
Net adverse clinical events, a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 monthscomposite
In patients with atrial fibrillation more than 1 year post-drug-eluting stent implantation, NOAC monotherapy significantly reduces net adverse clinical events compared to NOAC plus clopidogrel, driven by a reduction in bleeding.
BACKGROUND: Despite guideline recommendations, evidence for the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation after implantation of a drug-eluting stent remains limited. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial in South Korea, we assigned patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone the implantation of a drug-eluting stent at least 1 year earlier in a 1:1 ratio to receive NOAC monotherapy or combination therapy (NOAC plus clopidogrel). The primary end point was net adverse clinical events, a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months. The noninferiority margin was 3.0 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 960 patients underwent randomization: 482 patients to receive monotherapy and 478 to receive combination therapy. The mean age of the patients was 71.1 years, and 21.4% were women. At 12 months, a primary end-point event had occurred in 46 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 9.6%) in the monotherapy group and in 82 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 17.2%) in the combination-therapy group, for an absolute difference of -7.6 percentage points (95.2% confidence interval CI, -11.9 to -3.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and a hazard ratio of 0.54 (95.2% CI, 0.37 to 0.77; P<0.001 for superiority). Major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 25 patients (5.2%) in the monotherapy group and in 63 patients (13.2%) in the combination-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone implantation of a drug-eluting stent at least 1 year earlier, NOAC monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for net adverse clinical events. (Funded by Cardiovascular Research Center and Samjin Pharmaceutical; ADAPT AF-DES ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04250116.).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seung‐Jun Lee
Inje University
Hee Tae Yu
Electrophysiology
Yong-Joon Lee
Yonsei University
New England Journal of Medicine
Yonsei University
Hanyang University
Ewha Womans University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lee et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd291c30a474415f89e045 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2512091
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: