Why the study?
What is the rate of bleeding complications from pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis in patients undergoing general surgery?
What is the rate of bleeding complications from pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis in patients undergoing general surgery?
Pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis in general surgery patients is associated with a low rate of major bleeding complications (<3%), supporting its safe use.
Supports safe use of pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis in general surgery; confirms low major bleeding risk in Level 1 evidence.
HYPOTHESIS: Major bleeding complications from pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis are infrequent. DESIGN: Systematic review of the MEDLINE database from 1965 to August 2005, using the terms DVT, prophylaxis, general surgery, and heparin. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis in patients undergoing general surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eight complication categories: injection site bruising, wound hematoma, drain site bleeding, hematuria, gastrointestinal tract bleeding, retroperitoneal bleeding, discontinuation of prophylaxis, and subsequent operation. RESULTS: Fifty-two randomized controlled trials studied DVT prophylaxis; 33 randomized controlled trials with 33 813 patients undergoing general surgery evaluated pharmacologic prophylaxis and quantified bleeding complications. Of the minor complications, injection site bruising (6.9%), wound hematoma (5.7%), drain site bleeding (2.0%), and hematuria (1.6%) were most common. Major bleeding complications, such as gastrointestinal tract (0.2%) or retroperitoneal (<0.1%) bleeding, were infrequent. Discontinuation of prophylaxis occurred in 2.0% of patients and subsequent operation in less than 1% of patients. When analyzed by high- vs low-dose unfractionated heparin, the lower dose had a smaller rate of discontinuation of prophylaxis (P = .02) and subsequent operation (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of bleeding complication rates is important for surgeons because DVT prophylaxis may soon be implemented by Medicare as a quality measure. This level 1 evidence report shows that bleeding complications requiring a change in care occur less than 3% of the time and seem reduced with lower-dose prophylaxis. Given these findings, most patients undergoing general surgery could receive pharmacologic prophylaxis safely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael J. Leonardi (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: