Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While the disability community has long argued convincingly that disability is not a negative condition, academic and popular discourses on environmental justice routinely refer to disability as a prima facie harm to be avoided. This perpetuates the harms of ableism, and it is, furthermore, unnecessary in order to advance environmental justice. It is possible (a) to demand an investigation into the state of an environment, (b) to object to toxic environmental conditions and (c) to hold polluting parties accountable without assuming any overall difference in value or desirability between disabled and non-disabled lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas H. Bretz (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: