Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
emissions. This review outlines the advances in the precise design of inorganic- and organic-based porous electrocatalysts, which are designed by various strategies, to catalyze the OER in the electrolytic cycle for efficient water-splitting. For developing high-performance electrocatalysts with low overpotentials, it is important to design a chemical composition that optimizes binding energy for an intermediate in the OER and allows the easy access of reactants to active sites depending on the porosity of electrocatalysts. Porous structures give us the positive opportunity to increase the accessible surface of active sites and effective diffusion of targeting molecules, which is potentially one of the guidelines for developing active electrocatalysts. Further modification of the frameworks is also powerful for tailoring the function of pore surfaces and the environment of inner spaces. Designable organic molecules can also be embedded inside inorganic- and organic-based frameworks. According to chemical composition (inorganic and organic), nanostructure (crystalline and amorphous) and additional modification (metal doping and organic design) of porous electrocatalysts, the current status of resultant OER performance is surveyed with some problems that should be solved for improving the OER activity. The remarkable progress in OER electrocatalysts is also introduced for demonstrating the bifunctional hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and for utilizing seawater.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ami et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: