Uncovers the validity of a medieval agricultural revolution, suggesting a reassessment of agrarian advancements.
Lynn White Jr. and George Duby argued that there was an agricultural revolution in Northwest Europe during the Middle Ages. This thesis of a medieval agricultural revolution emphasizes the roles of the heavy plough, horse-drawn plough and three-field system, and holds that important agricultural advancements took place in a relatively short time, with significant economic and social impacts. However, subsequent studies shown that the heavy plough and the three-field system were ancient techniques, and that the importance of the horse-drawn plough and the three-field system was exaggerated. Moreover, the speed of their spread was very slow. The application of these technologies was often in response to demographic changes rather than a prerequisite for population growth. In addition, seed/yield ratios also show small and slow increases. As a result, the thesis of a medieval agricultural revolution has been largely discredited. However, the description of an “agricultural revolution” might still be appropriate for a region in a particular period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tianze LYU (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: